The answer to that question will take some time. Sorry. Here goes:
On the surface, the name Balanced Literacy sounds wonderful, right? I mean, what could be better than something completely balanced? We hear about balanced meals, balanced approaches to work life vs family life, and a host of other applications. The thing is, balanced literacy is nothing more than Whole Language (think Dick and Jane readers) repackaged for the new century. In case you are wondering, Whole Language was debunked during the 90s and Balanced Literacy arose from its ashes.
This quote from a NY Times article in 2014 sums up one of the most problematic perspectives on Balanced Literacy:
“The fatal flaw of balanced literacy is that it is least able to help students who most need it. It plays well in brownstone Brooklyn, where children have enrichment coming out of their noses, and may be more “ready” for balanced literacy than children without such advantages.”
The thing is, some of Balanced Literacy’s ideas do work … but ONLY after someone’s reading skills have reached the level of automaticity. They are not at all appropriate for someone still learning how to decode or how the English language works.
Here’s a report about Balanced Literacy and why it doesn’t qualify as “Good Instruction.” If you need more ammunition against Balanced Literacy, here’s Shanahan’s take. Learn what GOOD Instruction consists of and provide it.